Saturday, April 12, 2014

Blog: Transforming Ocean Plastic Into Fashion - Malibu Times: Blogs

Blog: Transforming Ocean Plastic Into Fashion - Malibu Times: Blogs:

As rescuers continue to frantically search for disappeared Malaysian Airline Flight MH370 a thousand miles or so west of Perth, Australia, one thing has become very apparent: the Indian Ocean is full of millions of tons of plastic. Did you know that 3.5 million pieces of plastic enter the oceans 24/7, 365 or the equivalent of 20 million tons a year?

By Reese Halter / Featured Blogger | Posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 12:15 pm
Most plastics entering our oceans break down into 'microplastic' or diminutive pieces that resemble confetti, and sealife mistake those microplastics for food. So now, millions of seabirds, tens of thousands of sea turtles and billions of fish are filled with pieces of plastic. By the way, microplastics act as powerful sponges for oceanic toxins such as: DDT, methyl-mercury, BPA, phalates, PCBs and flame-retardants. What we do to the oceans we do to ourselves. Clearly, the safety of seafood is in dire jeopardy.
The World Society for Protection of Animals reported that the bigger pieces of plastic ensnare and entangle between 57,000 and 135,000 whales each year. Single-use, disposable plastic bags look like jellyfish and sea turtles that unsuspectingly eat them die from septicemia or blood poisoning because it blocks their digestive system. For those of us who work on the sea, these nightmares are becoming all too familiar.
Last Sunday, I had the pleasure of having lunch with Captain Paul Watson, the founder of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and some of his team.
I asked Watson, "What can be done about our suffocating oceans?" He told me, "Creativity is the key to saving creation from our darker side and the key to a future of ecological harmony between humanity and the diversity of wondrous species we share this planet with."
We both agreed that humans are smashing problem solvers and exquisite toolmakers. I was thrilled to hear that Sea Shepherd was involved in an exciting collaboration called The Vortex Project, which is removing plastics from the oceans and beaches.
Watson explained, "The Vortex Project is a collaboration between eco-material innovator Bionic Yarn, Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and
Parley -- for the Oceans. Using Bionic Yarn's unique fibers made from ocean plastic, denim brand G-Star will produce G-Star's 'RAW for the Oceans', a line of denim with a purpose. The first collection will go on sale August 15 in G-Star RAW stores.
Sea Shepherd is using scientific innovation and awareness-building to mobilize teams around the globe to help clean up oceans and beaches.
Recycling, enhancing and reusing plastics for yarn and other elements in consumer products is smart and it is an excellent business model. There is no waste in nature. In order for 7.2 billion people to live on our planet, we require a 'closed loop' economy, whereby companies and consumers are rewarded for reducing waste and safeguarding our environment. The Vortex
Project is all about harmonizing the human economy with marine ecosystem health.
Let me remind you, irrespective of where you live on Earth, three out of every four breaths of air come from our oceans. Please reduce your dependence upon plastics. Buy a half dozen organic cotton bags, shop with them and refuse to use single-use, disposable plastic bags.
Not only did we share lots of laughter at lunch, but also I came away knowing that Captain Paul Watson is providing global leadership, helping to heal the seas at a pivotal time in the history of the human race.
Earth Dr Reese Halter is a broadcaster, biologist, educator and author of upcoming book Shepherding the Sea: The Race to Save Our Oceans

Coastal Commission Approves Santa Monica Mountains Plan

By Melissa Caskey / melissa@malibutimes.com | Posted: Friday, April 11, 2014 5:30 pm

The California Coastal Commission on Thursday approved a landmark land use plan for the Santa Monica Mountains, giving LA County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky a major victory as he wraps up his final year on the board.
Coastal Commissioners unanimously (12-0) approved the local coastal program (LCP), which toughens development regulations in the Santa Monica mountains and will make the county the sole authority on development and construction projects in the Santa Monica Mountains. 
Although the LCP was written and approved by the county back in 2007, the county spent the last six years making changes and working with stakeholders to finalize the plan for better chances of approval from the coastal body. 
"It’s a tribute to all the stakeholders — environmentalists, equestrians, homeowners, agricultural interests, among others — who came together to find common ground," Yaroslavsky said after the 12-0 vote. 
Yaroslavsky was among hundreds who attend Thursday's Coastal Commission meeting in Santa Barbara to speak about the LCP, with a majority in favor of its passage. 
The LCP was hotly opposed by some in the development and vineyard industry who feel it is too restrictive on agricultural uses. The LCP runs adjacent to Malibu city limits, covering unincorporated areas of the Santa Monica Mountains within LA County’s coastal zone—an area of about 80 square miles. In the absence of an LCP, the area has been operating under a Malibu Land Use Plan (LUP) certified by the Coastal Commission in 1986. 

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Broad Beach Sand Project Clears Major Hurdles

Broad Beach Sand Project Clears Major Hurdles - Malibu Times: News

By Jimy Tallal / Special to The Malibu Times | Posted: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 2:00 pm
Project to widen Broad Beach

Project to widen Broad Beach

Broad Beach has been receding for decades, a problem which accelerated sharply in the last few years. 

A stressful four-year, $7-million effort to bring sand to Malibu’s heavily eroded Broad Beach scored two major bureaucratic victories this week after the State Lands Commission (SLC) and California Coastal Commission (CCC) deemed the project application complete. 
The coastal development permit (CDP) seeks permission to truck in 600,000 cubic yards of sand from a commercial sand quarry in Moorpark to the once-abundant seaside neighborhood where 114 homeowners have banded together over the past several years in an attempt to restore the beach as part of the Geological Hazard Abatement District (GHAD). Proponents estimate the project will cost $20 million. 
Recognition of the application’s completion is not a go-ahead to begin trucking in sand, but proponents see it as a positive indicator of several governmental agencies getting behind the project. 
“We’re thrilled to be making progress toward restoring the beach so that everyone can use it again,” said project counsel Ken Ehrlich. “We hope the CCC and SLC decisions will spur the Army Corps of Engineers and the [LA] Regional Water Quality Control Board to go ahead and make their decisions.” 
To date, the GHAD has spent $7 million “without a pound of sand being brought in yet…most of it has gone to engineers and consultants for furnishing studies to the various agencies,” said GHAD project manager Mark Goss. 
Next, the Coastal Commission staff has 180 days (roughly six months) to place the application on a meeting agenda. 
“Our staff will aim to schedule this item for a Southern California CCC hearing within that time frame to enable local members of the public, interested parties and members of the GHAD to attend in person,” wrote Melissa Ahrens, CCC Planner. 
Goss said the latest news is a relief. 
“It’s been huge to get this ‘complete’ from the CCC,” said Goss, who also serves as president of the Malibu West HOA (owner of the Malibu West Swim Club on Broad Beach). 
Goss also hopes the other “agencies and sub-agencies” will get on board soon. 
“The Army Corps of Engineers hasn’t responded yet as to any additional information they might require, and we contact them at least weekly, if not daily,” he said. 
During the four-year long quest for approvals, the GHAD investigated more than 20 sources of sand, including more than half a dozen offshore sources from areas like Dockweiler Beach, the Ventura Harbor, Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach. But those considerations were met with heavy backlash from the media and residents. 
Now that an inland sand quarry has been approved as a source, Ehrlich said the GHAD’s goal is to have a hearing before the CCC this summer and begin the project in the fall. 
The $20-million project will restore Broad Beach to its original width of about 100 feet on the mile-long stretch of beach from Trancas Creek to Point Lechuza, and re-establish sand dunes with native plants. The sand replenishment will also bury an emergency rock revetment that was put up to protect 78 properties in 2010, following several years of unusually bad erosion. 
For residents, the project cannot start soon enough. Goss said the Malibu West Swim Club has lost 20 to 40 feet of beach width just in the past year, and as a result, they are rebuilding the lifeguard stand and removing playground equipment. In addition, he said that during a storm last month, the beach club “had seawater come onto its beach and into the parking lot.” 
“This last storm event should be further proof [to the government agencies] that we need to get off our bureaucratic rear ends and get this project started,” Goss said. “We hope we can convince the agencies that we’re not just whistling Dixie.” 

CA Coastal Commission To Review Paradiso Appeal

Article reposted from:  http://www.independent.com/news/2014/apr/08/ca-coastal-commission-review-paradiso-appeal/#commenttoggle

By Ray Ford ( Contact )
A surfer looks down on the Naples break. Under the development proposal for Paradiso del Maré this beach access spot will be lost. None of the alternative routes appear to be realistic.
A surfer looks down on the Naples break. Under the development proposal for Paradiso del Maré this beach access spot will be lost. None of the alternative routes appear to be realistic.

Coastal Staff Recommends Denial of the Appeal

Tuesday, April 8, 2014
The California Coastal Commission (CCC) will hear an appeal of the County Board of Supervisor’s approval of the Paradiso del Maré development project a half mile west of the Bacara Resort this Thursday, April 10. The project was approved by the Santa Barbara Planning Commission in November 2013. After an appeal by the Gaviota Coast Conservancy (GCC), Surfrider and other groups soon thereafter, the Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 to deny the appeal in early February.
On February 28, GCC, Surfrider, the Santa Barbara Chapter of Audubon and Peter Howorth filed an appeal with the Coastal Commission citing a failure of the project to conform with the standards in the County’s Local Coastal Program (LCP). Acting as attorney for the groups, attorney Marc Chytilo argued the LCP requires protection of environmentally sensitive habitats such as the Naples Seal Rookery, White-tailed kite habitat and public access to the beach.
According to the Commission Staff Report, which can be accessed on the CCC website, notes that evaluation of such an appeal requires that it raise “a substantial issue” as to the consistency or inconsistency of the County’s LCP, extent and scope of the development proposal, significance of the coastal resources affected by the decision, its potential for serving as a precedent for future interpretation of the LCP or whether the appeal raises only local issues or those of regional or statewide significance. In a 58-page document that included several hundred pages of appendices, the Commission Staff concluded “no substantial issue is raised with respect to the consistency of the approved development with the policies of the County’s certified LCP.”
Staff also noted, “In addition, the development is not extensive in scope given the large area of the parcel proposed to be retained in open space, the project is not expected have adverse impacts on significant coastal resources, the project is not likely to serve as a negative precedent for the County’s future interpretation of its LCP or the Gaviota Coast Plan given the unique site circumstances, and, although the appeal raises issues of statewide importance, the above analysis indicates that no substantial question regarding policy consistency exists based on the project components and unique site circumstances.”
In a telephone interview with me yesterday, Chytilo strongly disagreed with the Staff recommendation to deny the appeal. “We believe there were important coastal resources at issue here, including the seal rookery, the kite habitat and public access to the beach, Chytilo said. “The key issue is whether there are conflicts between the Coastal Act and our Local Coastal Program. We think they [Staff] got it wrong.”
Though typically the Coastal Commission doesn’t override its Staff’s recommendations, Chytilo pointed out that the Commission composition continues to change and “you never know” how they will decide this.
The CCC meeting will be held at the Hyatt Hotel located at 1111 E. Cabrillo Boulevard beginning at 8:30am. The Paradiso appeal more-than-likely will not be heard until the afternoon. While the Staff recommendation was not encouraging, Chytilo is urging community members to attend the meeting and let the Commission know there is solid opposition to the development proposal.

Coastal Commission to Decide on LCP for Santa Monica Mountains - Malibu Times: News

Coastal Commission to Decide on LCP for Santa Monica Mountains - Malibu Times: News: The California Coastal Commission on Thursday will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve a local coastal program (LCP) governing future …