Tuesday, June 9, 2015

San Diego - Seawall legal case heats up

Homeowners, state agency at odds over seawall as legal briefs filed in California Supreme Court

Encinitas resident Gerry Rahill, at right, who supports resident's rights to build seawalls, argues with the Surfrider Foundation's Tom Cook, close left.
Encinitas resident Gerry Rahill, at right, who supports resident's rights to build seawalls, argues with the Surfrider Foundation's Tom Cook, close left. — Charlie Neuman / UT San Diego
 — With a potentially precedent-setting legal battle over an Encinitas seawall in the hands of the state’s highest court, the San Diego County Chapter of the Surfrider Foundation used the sand-colored structure as a backdrop Monday to announce it’s joining the fight.
Two Encinitas families have sued the California Coastal Commission, challenging the agency’s power to institute a 20-year time limit on seawall permits. The outcome of the case could affect sea walls all along the California coast.
The case highlights the clash between property owners, who argue seawalls are necessary to fend off erosion and protect homes, and others — including the commission — who say the structures harm public resources by preventing the wear and tear on bluffs critical to sustaining healthy beaches. 
The Surfrider Foundation held a news conference at the Encinitas seawall on Monday as the Coastal Commission filed its opening brief in the lawsuit with the California Supreme Court. Surfrider’s legal director, Angela Howe, said the group will file a friend-of-the-court brief with the high court by the end of July. She said Surfrider backs the commission’s ability to regulate permits and require periodic reviews, such as the 20-year term that is part of the battle in Encinitas.
“We really want to stress that this (sand) is not an infinite resource,” said Tom Cook, who chairs the chapter’s beach preservation committee.
A handful of people, including area homeowners, showed up Monday to challenge the group’s assertions. Many argued that amount of beach sand created by bluff erosion is negligible, and that property owners should have the right to protect their homes. One said he fears he will be handed a 20-year permit should he need to replace or fortify sea walls.
“We need harmony between the homeowners and the Coastal Commission,” said Mark Francois, who bought a home with a sea wall in the 1990s.
The Encinitas fight centers on a seawall and staircase that were destroyed when heavy rains led to a bluff collapse in late 2010. The city gave two Neptune Avenue homeowners — the Frick and Lynch families — permission to rebuild both structures.
But the permit is only good for 20 years. When it expires, the homeowners will have to reapply to keep it in place; if no extension is granted, the wall will have to come down. 
With the limited permit in hand, the homeowners elected to rebuild the wall to protect their blufftop homes. But they also sued the state commission over the expiration date. 
The families are represented by Pacific Legal Foundation, which promotes property rights and limited government. The nonprofit firm often takes on the California Coastal Commission. 
Foundation attorney J. David Breemer said Monday that the Encinitas site had a seawall in place for decades before this battle, and that it should not be “the poster child for seawall activism.”
Tom Frick said Monday he was confident the court will “see the injustice. We have been wrongly treated over these years.”
Sarah Christie, a spokeswoman for the California Coastal Commission, also sounded confident.
“While seawalls protect private property, the evidence is clear that they also lead to the demise of public beaches,” she said.
Given rising sea levels, Christie said, the permit limits make sense because they allow the commission to review the realities of what is happening on the ground and in the water. 
In court documents, the commission argued that the 20-year time frame will allow the commission to review the impacts of the seawall, “which may be far different from they are now, particularly given the uncertainties related to sea level rise.”
In April 2013, a San Diego Superior Court trial judge sided with the families, calling the agency’s time limit “a power grab.” In September, a split appeals court in San Diego reversed the trial court, affirming the Coastal Commission’s ability to set time limits. The high court agreed to take the case last year. No date for arguments has been set.
© Copyright 2015 The San Diego Union-Tribune. All rights reserved.

San Diego Surfrider launches Ocean Friendly Restaurants campaign

San Diego Surfrider launches Ocean Friendly Restaurants campaign: The Surfrider Foundation’s San Diego County chapter has launched the Ocean Friendly Restaurants campaign, which aims to reduce beach pollution by working with the San Diego County restaurant commun...

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Tar balls close 4-mile stretch of Long Beach coastline, animals affected

Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) volunteers walk the coastline of Long Beach on Thursday morning looking for and flagging tar balls washed ashore. The tar balls were discovered Wednesday afternoon and the beach remains closed from 1st Street to 72nd Place until further notice. Long Beach June 4, 2015. (Photo by Brittany Murray / Daily Breeze) 
A roughly 4-mile swath of beach in Long Beach remained closed Thursday after tar balls washed ashore, the second such closure in a week along the Southern California coast.
Although the local shoreline appeared to be clear of the substance as of early afternoon, officials were waiting until the tide receded later in the day to find out if any more of the muck has been deposited on the sand, Long Beach Fire Department spokesman Jake Heflin said.
The tar balls, globules of what officials described as a petroleum substance, first appeared along Long Beach’s shoreline at about 4 p.m. Wednesday from 1st Place to 72nd Place. A similar substance was discovered along 8 miles of South Bay beaches last week, leading authorities to close beaches from Redondo Beach to El Segundo from May 27-29. 
In both cases, officials said testing is underway to determine if the tar balls are related to the oil spill north of Santa Barbara on May 19.
The affected stretch in Long Beach will not be reopened until health and environmental concerns can be addressed, Heflin said. Officials said Thursday they did not know whether they were witnessing the beginning or ending stages of the tar ball episode.
“There have been ongoing efforts throughout the evening to make sure we are mitigating and minimizing any potential impact, not only on our beaches and protecting the environment, but also protecting and preserving public health and public safety,” Heflin told reporters at a beachside briefing Thursday.
On Thursday, workers for Ocean Blue Environmental Services had collected 55 gallons of the petroleum-based deposits along the shore, Heflin said. Additional amounts of the thick, black substance had washed ashore since those early cleanup efforts.
“We are seeing new product come up. We saw it this morning,” Heflin said in an interview following the briefing.
“It’s heavier than water so it rolls underneath the water and it eventually gets pushed on shore,” he said.
There is concern among officials that wildlife may be harmed by the tar-like substance.
Heflin told reporters a pelican was found saturated with oil and was being treated. A sea lion was seen on a breakwater in the ocean, possibly contaminated by oil, but it swam away.
Long Beach Fire Chief Mike DuRee said Thursday that crews are canvassing the breakwater area, where a fairly large population of brown pelicans congregate. Any animals affected will be cared for by Long Beach Animal Control Services. 
Advertisement
The U.S. Coast Guard was also on scene collecting samples of the petroleum-based deposits for testing that could provide insight as to the substance’s source, officials said. Fire officials are unsure how long it will take to get the results of the tests.
There is no indication the incident is related to any Long Beach Gas and Oil operations, Heflin said.
DuRee said the substance washing ashore is “considerably different” from the oily substance often seen on area beaches. 
Justin Lee, operations director of Ocean Blue, said in a telephone interview that it is possible for tar-like substances to appear at local beaches as a result of natural processes. Plate tectonics activity can result in such substances being released from the earth’s crust, but Lee said observations along Long Beach’s shoreline have not been consistent with what he would expect to have been seen if the tar balls are the result of natural phenomena.
“This does seem to be way more than usual when that happens,” he said.
Long Beach residents are advised to keep off area beaches because of the possibility of unsafe conditions, Heflin said. Beach users are advised to avoid contact with oil tars washed ashore or found in the water. Contact with oil tars may cause skin irritation and long-term health effects.
All reports of oil debris should be made to the National Response Center hotline at 800-424-8802.
The tar balls washing ashore in Long Beach come nearly a week after large globs of tar washed ashore in the South Bay. Additional tar balls washed ashore earlier this week in Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach, but the Coast Guard said the amount was not cause for concern. The tar patties were in line with what is typically seen on the beach from time to time from natural seepage, a Coast Guard spokesman said.
Staff writer Carley Dryden contributed to this report.